SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - IMPORTANT JUDGEMENTS ON ARTICLE 21 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - IMPORTANT JUDGEMENTS ON ARTICLE 21 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

1.

A.K. Gopalan Vs. The State Of Madras, (1950) 05 SC CK 0006

2.

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Another, (1978) 01 SC CK 0026

3.

Hussainara Khatoon And Others Vs. Home Secretary, State Of Bihar, (1979) 05 SC CK 0021

4.

Vineet Narain And Others Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Another, (1997) 12 SC CK 0045

5.

Satwant Singh Sawhney Vs. D. Ramarathnam, Assistant Passport Officer, Government Of India, New Delhi And Others, (1967) 04 SC CK 0034

6.

Kharak Singh Vs. The State Of U.P. And Others, (1962) 12 SC CK 0019

7.

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration And Others Etc., (1978) 08 SC CK 0001

8.

Prem Shankar Shukla Vs. Delhi Administration, (1980) 04 SC CK 0040

9.

Pt. Parmanand Katara, Advocate Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Another, (1995) 01 SC CK 0074

10.

Consumer Education And Research Center And Others Vs. Union Of India And Others, (1995) 01 SC CK 0143

11.

LIC Of India And Another Vs. Consumer Education And Research Center And Others, (1995) 05 SC CK 0069

12.

Chameli Singh And Others Etc. Vs. State Of U.P. And Another, (1995) 12 SC CK 0104

13.

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress And Others, (1990) 09 SC CK 0031

14.

Vishaka And Others Vs. State Of Rajasthan And Others, (1997) 08 SC CK 0003

15.

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Another, (1978) 01 SC CK 0026

16.

Francis Coralie Mullin Vs. Administrator, Union Territory Of Delhi And Others, (1981) 01 SC CK 0001

17.

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration And Others Etc., (1978) 08 SC CK 0001

18.

State Of Maharashtra Vs. Prabhakar Pandurang Sangzgiri And Another, (1965) 09 SC CK 0006

19.

Sher Singh And Others Vs. State Of Punjab, (1983) 03 SC CK 0008

20.

Attorney General Of India Vs. Lachma Devi And Others, (1985) 12 SC CK 0003

21.

Deena Alias Deen Dayal And Others Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Others, (1983) 09 SC CK 0017

22.

Babu Singh And Others Vs. State Of U.P., (1978) 01 SC CK 0030

23.

Zahira Habibullah Sheikh And Another Etc. Vs. State Of Gujarat And Others Etc., (2004) 05 SC CK 0002

24.

Hussainara Khatoon And Others Vs. Home Secretary, State Of Bihar, Patna, (1979) 03 SC CK 0005

25.

Madhav Hayawadanrao Hoskot Vs. State Of Maharashtra, (1978) 08 SC CK 0025

26.

Joginder Kumar Vs. State Of U.P. And Others, (1994) 04 SC CK 0040

27.

Mr ''X'' Vs. Hospital ''Z'', (1998) 09 SC CK 0071

28.

People''S Union Of Civil Liberties (PUCL) Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Another, (1996) 12 SC CK 0098

29.

In Re: Noise Pollution - Implementation of the Laws for restricting use of loudspeakers and high volume producing sound systems Forum, Prevention of Envn. and Sound Pollution, vs., (2005) 07 SC CK 0017

30.

Murli S. Deora Vs. Union Of India And Ors, (2001) 11 SC CK 0067

31.

Smt. Gian Kaur Vs. State Of Punjab, (1996) 03 SC CK 0087

32.

Olga Tellis And Others Vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation And Others Vayyapuri Kuppusami And Others, (1985) 07 SC CK 0019

33.

Sheela Barse Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Others, (1988) 08 SC CK 0069

34.

Miss. Mohini Jain Vs. State Of Karnataka And Others, (1992) 07 SC CK 0015

35.

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Others, (1997) 11 SC CK 0060

36.

Chameli Singh And Others Etc. Vs. State Of U.P. And Another, (1995) 12 SC CK 0104

37.

Rudul Sah Vs. State Of Bihar And Another, (1983) 08 SC CK 0019


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HON’BLE SUPREME COURT WHILE DELIVERING A LANDMARK JUDGEMENT GRANTED INTERIM PROTECTION TO THE JOURNALIST ARNAB MANORANJAN GOSWAMI

Image
Arnab Manoranjan Goswami Vs. State Of Maharashtra & Ors., (2020) 11 SC CK 0038 While disposing of the Criminal Appeal filed by the Journalist Mr. Arnab Manoranjan Goswami against the Order of Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay, the Hon’ble Supreme Court directed that interim protection which has been granted to the above accused by the order dated 11 November 2020 shall continue to remain in operation pending the disposal of the proceedings before the High Court and thereafter for a period of four weeks from the date of the judgment of the High Court, should it become necessary for all or any of them to take further recourse to their remedies in accordance with law. In said Judgement, the Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that the Chief Justices of every High Court should in their administrative capacities utilize the ICT tools which are placed at their disposal in ensuring that access to justice is democratized and equitably allocated. Liberty is not a gift for the few...
Read more

SUPREME COURT REITERATED THAT PRINCIPLE OF NOT ENTERTAINING SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION AGAINST AN ORDER REJECTING THE REVIEW PETITION WHEN MAIN JUDGMENT IS NOT UNDER CHALLENGE HAS BECOME A PRECEDENTIAL PRINCIPLE.

Image
  T.K. David Vs. Kuruppampady Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. & Ors, (2020) 10 SC CK 0006 A Full Bench of the Supreme Court while dismissing a special leave to appeal against the Division Bench judgment of the Kerala High Court dated 06.02.2020 rejecting the Review Petition filed by the petitioner in Writ Appeal held that the rationale for not entertaining a special leave petition challenging the order of High Court rejecting the review petition when main order in the writ petition is not challenged can be easily comprehended. Against the main judgment the SLP having been dismissed earlier the same having become final between the parties cannot be allowed to be affected at the instance of petitioner. When the main judgment of the High Court cannot be effected in any manner, no relief can be granted by this Court in the special leave petition filed against order rejecting review application to review the main judgment of the High Court. This Court does not entertai...
Read more